Source: http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2015/09/10
/blogs/pictures-of-the-day-japan-and-elsewhere/s/
20150910POD-slide-9F76.html
|
Smog is a hot-button topic for
several countries around the globe as the world continues to burn fossil
fuel. There are reports of dangerous smog
occurring in France, Indonesia, and most recently China to name a few. The term “smog” was first coined in 1905 by
Dr. Henry Antoine Des Voeux by combining the words “smoke” and “fog” to
describe the hazardous haze (3). Normally, the acceptable level of air
pollutants, including smog, is around 25 to 30 micrograms before it becomes
dangerous (1). Likewise, based on the air quality index,
anything over 200 is considered to be unhealthy (4). Both Delhi and Beijing have violated the
acceptable level of air pollutants with numbers exceeding 300 micrograms of
smog and Indonesia has a number of 983 on the air quality index (1, 4). As a part of the Global Burden of Disease
Project, scientists say more than 5.5 million people worldwide are dying
prematurely per year due to the smog (1).
Breathing in the smog at unsafe levels can lead to an increased risk of
heart disease, stroke, cancers, and respiratory irritation (1). Smog causes severe and lasting effects on the
ecosystem but can also cause drastic economic losses due to countries having to
shut down production to prevent people from being exposed (2,
3). The elderly as well as children are the most vulnerable to the smog’s often
deadly effects (1).
There
are several case studies to examine where the smog has gotten out of control. In
Indonesia, plantations have farmed over peatland and when the farmland is dried
out, it is burned for the next planting season which is outlawed by the
government (4). However, plantation
owners who part-took in it this season caused a thick haze that spread across
Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia (4).
The haze is augmented by this year’s El Nino which has created drier
conditions for the fires to continue to burn (4). In Paris, smog has affected the quality of
air. A prediction was made by air quality control monitors that the smog would
reach unsafe levels in March of 2015 (5).
In China, there was a week-long epidemic of smog which shut down the country
due to unsafe levels in 2013 in Beijing (3). In 2015, China issued its first
“red alert” because the air quality index was
308 (2). Due to the alert, schools, businesses, and factories were shut down
and motorists were forced off the roads to wait for the smog to clear (2). China has among the world’s worst air due to
the perpetual burning of coal from the industry (2).
More can be done but these
countries in each case study have been putting forth effort to clean up their
act. In Indonesia, personnel worked
tirelessly to put out the flames by dropping water over the inferno and coercing
rainfall by using chemicals (4). In
addition, seven executives of plantation companies were arrested for starting
fires and face a fine of roughly $700,000 and up to ten years jail time (4). In
France, drivers were temporarily banned from the roads, barring emergency
vehicles and electric cars (5).
Furthermore, all public transportation was free for the period in curb
the possible air pollution (5). Although
precautionary, France has been actively trying to combat the on-going smog by
discouraging motorists. China is
beginning to battle smog after issuing a red alert unlike earlier in the year
when an orange alert, meaning limited exposure to the outdoors, was issued (2).
China’s code system, which is a part of their plan to reduce the smog, was
strengthened in 2013 to hopefully gain a grasp on the situation (2).
The research
article by Shi, et al, 2016, offered
some options for the world to decrease smog.
Firstly, monitoring the air and scientific research are invaluable to
assess the problem (3). Next would be creating
and implementing policies, similar to Indonesia and China, and then evaluating
if the policies are aiding (3). The
authors also suggested economic incentives such as carbon taxes or tax breaks
for clean energy and educating the public to lessen emissions (3). Finally, advancements in a cleaner technology
should be implemented as well as change societal norms through less consumption
of conventional livestock and greener celebrations (3). There is support from
people globally for more aggressive policies to prevent the smog from worsening
(1, 5). Despite this, people globally
need to change their attitude towards smog to correct it. Education is needed and incentives would
easily complement the cause. The
“airpocalype” can be stopped only if everyone pitches in and reduce emissions
(2).