Here in the United States, we have little if
anything to worry about in regards to Fukushima’s fallout, but in Japan it’s an
entirely different story. The catastrophe happened on their soil and the Japanese
people are feeling it. They have questions not being answered, death tolls that
are steadily rising, a cleanup that is lagging far behind, and pressure to
reopen the other nuclear plants of Japan.
The exact radioactivity surrounding the
Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant is disputed.
Weeks after the disaster, it was estimated that 10,000 times as much
radioactive cesium 137 was contaminating the immediate area of the Pacific
Ocean than was produced during the Chernobyl meltdown. But it is hard to come
by any solid, peer-reviewed, and publicly accessible data, as most of Japan’s
scientist skitter away from “bad tasting” outcomes and fall to pressure to put
this debacle under pretty lights. Overall, the toll Fukushima has taken on
Japan’s environment is mostly unknown.
The toll on its people however has been relatively
high. To date,
approximately 2,969 people in both the Fukushima Prefecture and surrounding
areas have died as indirect results of the meltdown—usually due to a stress
related illness cause by their displacement due to Fukushima. And that’s on top
of the 1,607 people who passed in direct relation to the meltdown. Added to
that is a small percentage rise in children’s cancer rates.
Cleanup isn’t helping either. Although
the government has proposed a plan to dump quantities of treated contaminated water into
the Pacific—a global common
practice that honestly won’t hurt anything—to reduce the overload Fukushima is
seeing, there are other hampering problems. These problems lie in the unskilled and untrained cleanup crews. In a desperate need for workers, Tepco—the owners
of the Fukushima nuclear powerplant—have hired people who have never worked
with such sensitive material and are being sent out without the needed
training.
Most of the Japanese are pretty clear on one
thing: they don’t want nuclear power back. Only 10% of the villages that host nuclear plants are willing to
reopen their hearts to the cause, and the majority of them want reforms in
precautions beforehand.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteCalifornia has been cutting back its use of nuclear power for generating electricity for any years. They are down to one operating plant near San Luis Obispo. Solutions for how to replace that production are mixed, as they try to balance concerns and regulatory costs of fossil fuels with the reduced supply stability of renewables such as wind, solar, and even hydropower (working less well in drought years):
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-power-prices-20140426,0,6329274.story#axzz2zyq0yIUl