One in nine people are hungry every
night when they go to bed (1). As the population continues to
grow to 9 billion, agriculture must increase in both sustainability and yield
to decrease hunger now and for future generations. Hunger and malnutrition will
worsen as the population grows. The main question is how enough food will be grown
in such a short period of time. This is a global issue which allows many people
to have opinions about accomplishing this goal. Strategies for creating more
sustainable agriculture dominate this topic.
Organic agriculture is the
mainstream form of sustainable agriculture in developed countries. People buy
more expensive, organic food for the guarantee of no chemical use, higher
nutritional content, and protection of the environment. The largest critique of
organic farming is that the yields will never be as high as conventional
farming, but this has been studied, reviewed, and found to be false (2). Figure 1 summarize data collected
during 40 years of studies showing that organic farming is superior to
conventional methods in four categories: productivity, economics, environment, and community well-being.
Organic farming will increase the food security, but will the implementation of
sustainable methods such as organic farming occur quickly enough?
Figure 1: An assessment of organic farming relative to conventional farming illustrates that organic systems better balance the four areas of sustainability. Credit: Reganold and Wachter
The only thing growing faster than the global population is
the growing use of technology in daily life. Technology is spreading rapidly throughout
the world and could be the answer to food security for the future by making
research more efficient and developing methods to increase organic yields.
Current research focuses around new fertilization techniques (3), genetically programed soil (4), and the use of drones to monitor
plants and yields (4; 5). An essential technological
development is the use of artificial intelligence to monitor plant growth.
Sensors and drones can help maximize efficiency and minimize waste by
collecting data on quality of plants, pest location, resource availability, and
soil quality (5). This technology can also maximize agriculture
research and development (5) because these projects require
enormous amounts of data collection and data analysis. For example, soil microbes are crucial for
soil health and high crop yields. Researchers are finding ways to program soil
microbes to create healthier soils that require less external inputs such as
fertilizer and water (4). These techniques involve
technology such as genetic sequencing but also require enormous amounts of data
collection. Technology such as drones can collect data and increase the
efficiency of these studies. Technology is not just about implementing computer
programs or drones, it is also about using resources that are already available
in a new way. In developing countries technology like drones and artificial
intelligence may be financially impossible to implement. However, if technology
is applied to develop and maximize the efficiency of resources, new techniques
may be affordable to these countries. One example is the use of human waste as
fertilizer (3). This method would work well for
agricultural areas close to cities since cities produce lots of waste. It could
also reduce importing expensive fertilizers. The technology must be improved to
treat the waste efficiently and transport it practically (3). These methods can make agriculture
more sustainable by reducing waste and external inputs. Overall, technology has
increased the speed of agricultural innovation while also allowing new
techniques to be created.
Other views
believe that technology will not be able to feed the growing population. Some
say the growing population will result in the loss of biodiversity and the
soil’s capacity to produce crops and the only way to feed the world is to
reduce the population (6). Population growth must be limited,
but strategies such as organic farming work to increase biodiversity and
protect the soil. Others believe that technology will be limited by economic
stress and societal pressures (7). The public already opposes
innovations such as genetically modified crops (GMOs), so there may be other
innovations that the public rejects. This can be avoided mainly by educating
the public on the benefits of sustainable agriculture and the usefulness of
technology. Implementation of new
technology can increase costs, but can ultimately pay for itself in the form of
higher yields and efficiency.
I believe that a balanced system of
sustainable agricultural practices such as organic farming along with new
techniques that benefit specific areas such as human waste fertilizer and the
implementation of artificial intelligence is the only way we will be able to
feed the world in the next generations. With the increase of soil quality,
yields will increase, and economies will flourish while the people are fed. Technology
when implemented carefully and with consideration for the environment and
society will allow us to increase food production and food security globally.
Sources:
- Zero Hunger. (n.d.). Retrieved
March 9, 2019, from https://www1.wfp.org/zero-hunger
- Kantor, S. (2016,
February 3). Organic agriculture key to feeding the world sustainably. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 7,
2019, from www.sciencedaily.com
- University of
Illinois. (2018, August 16). Human wastewater valuable to global
agriculture, economics. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 7, 2019, from www.sciencedaily.com
- DOE/Lawrence Berkeley National
Laboratory. (2018, March 14). Digging deep: Harnessing the power of soil
microbes for more sustainable farming. ScienceDaily.
Retrieved April 7, 2019, from www.sciencedaily.com
- Newman, Danial. (2019, February
7). 4 Ways Artificial Intelligence Will Drive Digital Transformation In
Agriculture. Forbes. Retrieved
April 7, 2019, from www.forbes.com
- German Centre for Integrative
Biodiversity Research. (2019, March 4). Biodiversity crisis: Technological
advances in agriculture are not a sufficient response. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 7,
2019, from www.sciencedaily.com
- University of East Anglia.
(2018, December 21). Responsible innovation key to smart farming. ScienceDaily. Retrieved April 7,
2019, from www.sciencedaily.com
Sustainable farming and food scarcity is a growing issue around the world. There are many different tactics for improving farming techniques with some being more feasible than others. By implementing genetically programmed soil will that result in some microbes becoming more dominant, leading to a decline in other essential microbe populations? With technologies increasing, but at a cost, will communities be wiling to support their local farmers through funding to help purchase these technologies or even become organic?
ReplyDeleteThe goal of programming microbes is to create the most healthy ecosystem within the soil environment, so I am sure they would consider all aspects including keeping microbe levels consistent.
DeleteThe cost of using new technology should pay for itself as yields begin to increase. Organic products can also be priced higher than other products. Consumers are starting to buy organic more often which will support these farmers. There are also co-ops that hep support organic farmers (like we saw in the video) where consumers buy in and then receive produce as it ripens through the summer and fall.
Furthermore, governments can support these switches and innovations by giving tax breaks and credits to these farmers.
I agree that this is a major issue the globe is facing. My concern is how long would it take to change people's opinions? Many people are so stuck in their views that majority of the time they will not change their ideas. Are there specific programs where people could learn more and, if there are, are they actually helping?
ReplyDeleteI agree that it will be hard to change society in the upcoming years to trust science and act mor sustainably. Currently there are programs that try to bring awareness to these issues. Many of them are governmental which is hard because many people are also skeptical of the government. I would say the affectiveness of these programs depends from one community to another.
DeleteIn some rural areas, best management (time, $) of livestock wastes for fertilizing croplands may help improve sustainability.
ReplyDeleteDo you know if some of these techniques are being used to evaluate the benefits of different polyculture methods? I suspect there may end up being a link between old (plant combinations) and new (soil "programming").