Monday, April 22, 2019

Negative and Positive Affects of the Melting of Arctic Ice on a Variety of Species

           As the arctic ice melts many different species are being affected and changing the way that they live. Temperatures are increasing from global warming and it is causing the ice to melt3. Majority of species are being affected negatively, however some are benefiting from the decrease in ice. 

            Polar bears, for example, have been struggling to find food and are losing the majority of their habitat. This is causing them to venture further for food as well as go into more populated areas. The polar bears are going into people’s homes and offices1. People are afraid of being attacked and are afraid to leave their homes. In some areas extra fences or military are used to patrol and keep people safe. Some people want the bears to be killed, however in some countries such as Russia the polar bear is listed as an endangered animal, so shooting them is prohibited. 

Image 1: Polar Bear Struggling to Find Food. Source: National Geographic6
           Another species suffering from the decrease in ice is the ringed seal. The seals make small ice caves to raise their young and are having a difficult time creating them. They used older, sturdier ice to build these caves and approximately 95% of the sturdier ice is gone2. Since they are losing the ability to make these caves they are getting preyed upon more frequently. The pups are mostly at risk, especially those who are unweaned. The University of Alberta in Canada and the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands created a mathematical model that predicts that by 2100 the ringed seal population could decrease by 50-99%2. They also determined that the decreasing snow and ice will lead to fewer juvenile seals than adults in the future. 

Image 2: Ringed Seal Pup in Alaska. Source: Forbes2 
            One species that is benefiting from the arctic ice melting is the beaver. The beaver is moving into areas that are melting and expanding their range. This is benefiting them by increasing their population and the food they have access to. However, this is creating a negative impact on the habitat in the north. They are creating dams which are creating new water channels. The channels they are creating are making permafrost, permanently frozen ground, melt at a fast rate3. Permafrost holds the soil together, so these channels are washing away soil along with other things such as carbon. The carbon released is accelerating the warming and harming the environment. 

We need to find a way to help species losing their habitats. The loss of their habitats is what is causing the negative interactions with humans. We must slow down the melting of the ice. One way to do this is to cut back on mining, oil and gas exploration, ports or other industrial incursions. The United Nations Environment Program estimated that 15 percent of the region's lands were affected in 2001 by these activities4. There are also possible ways to increase the ice such as using wind-powered pumps in the winter 5. The pumps are designed to bring the water to the surface where it would freeze and allow thicker ice to be formed. The beavers also need to be dealt with. They are benefiting from the expanding habitat, however are causing more damage to the environment. The arctic ice melting is an issue for many different species and if it is not dealt with soon it can cause a loss of the habitat and multiple species. How do we decide what species are more important in assisting? Should species like the beaver be removed in order to save the ice from melting and harming other species? 

Sources:
1: Mack, E. (2019, February 9). Threatened Polar Bears Are Terrorizing An Arctic Town.  Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericmack/2019/02/09/threatened-polar-bears-are-terrorizing-a-small-arctic-town/#231688406710
2: McMillan, F. (2019, January 30). Climate Change Is Melting Arctic Sea Ice - And That's Endangering Ringed Seal Populations. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/fionamcmillan/2019/01/30/the-decline-of-arctic-snow-could-decimate-ringed-seals/#46893f5f650b
3: Pierre-Louis, K. (2017, December 20). Beavers Emerge as Agents of Arctic Destruction. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/20/climate/arctic-beavers-alaska.html
4: Myers, S.L., Revkin, A.C., Romero, S., Krauss, C. (2005, October 20). Old Ways of Life Are Fading as the Arctic Thaws. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/science/earth/old-ways-of-life-are-fading-as-the-arctic-thaws.html
5: Rosen, J. (2017, February 8).  Arctic 2.0: What happens after all the ice goes? Nature. Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/news/arctic-2-0-what-happens-after-all-the-ice-goes-1.21431
6. Leahy, S. (2018, February 1). POV FOOTAGE SHOWS POLAR BEARS STRUGGLING TO FIND FOOD. National Geographic. Retrieved from: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/polar-bears-starve-melting-sea-ice-global-warming-study-beaufort-sea-environment/

5 comments:

  1. This article raises an ethical question to mind that you began to touch on in the concluding sentences- how much involvement should humans have in changing an ecosystem? I am of course all for the protection of the environment, limiting climate change, and protecting species, but should we limit/destroy the growth of one species to promote another?
    If we thought about this in human terms, should we rob the rich to give to the poor? and will our funds to the poor be sufficient to actually help them?
    In otherwords, how do you think the limiting of beavers will specifically help the seals and polar bears? And is the amount of work needed to limit the beavers humanely worth it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that there are many different issues to consider when trying to find a solution to this problem. It is hard to determine if we should help one species over another. You bring up valid points with the rich and poor example and I originally did not see it that way. Maybe instead of reducing the growth of a species we control the range it has access to. I think the main issue that needs to be handled is the carbon emission that is decreasing the ice. If this is handled then issues such as the problems with the beaver would be less of a concern.

      Delete
    2. I agree that the focus should be on reducing global warming and the loss of ice in the first place, but do you think it is possible for this to occur given the amount of time these species have left?

      Delete
  2. Interesting on how melting glaciers can have such a diverse, large scale impact on animals that live within the region by limiting habitat for some organisms while providing it for others. Although, I am skeptical the efficiency of the wind-powered water pumps and what additional issues may arise from them. How will more human interaction interfere with the wildlife, will it produce noise pollution, cost/repercussions of installing the pumps, and will this ice buildup become sturdy enough to support arctic life?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that the pumps could cause more issues especially when it comes to additional human interaction. I think the main focus we should have is reducing mining, oil and gas exploration, ports or other industrial incursions. I am curious to look into other ways people are trying to rebuild the ice and how it is affecting species.

      Delete