Polar bears, for example, have been struggling to find food and are losing the majority of their habitat. This is causing them to venture further for food as well as go into more populated areas. The polar bears are going into people’s homes and offices1. People are afraid of being attacked and are afraid to leave their homes. In some areas extra fences or military are used to patrol and keep people safe. Some people want the bears to be killed, however in some countries such as Russia the polar bear is listed as an endangered animal, so shooting them is prohibited.
Image 1:
Polar Bear Struggling to Find Food. Source: National Geographic6 |
Image 2:
Ringed Seal Pup in Alaska. Source: Forbes2
|
We need to find a way to
help species losing their habitats. The loss of their habitats is what is causing
the negative interactions with humans. We must slow down the melting of the ice. One way to do this is to cut
back on mining, oil and gas exploration, ports or other industrial incursions.
The United Nations Environment Program estimated that 15 percent of the
region's lands were affected in 2001 by these activities4.
There are also possible ways to increase the ice such as using wind-powered
pumps in the winter 5. The pumps are designed to bring the water to the surface where it would freeze and allow thicker ice to be formed. The beavers also need to be dealt with. They are benefiting from the expanding
habitat, however are causing more damage to the environment. The arctic ice
melting is an issue for many different species and if it is not dealt with soon
it can cause a loss of the habitat and multiple species. How do we decide what
species are more important in assisting? Should species like the beaver be
removed in order to save the ice from melting and harming other species?
Sources:
1:
Mack, E. (2019, February 9). Threatened
Polar Bears Are Terrorizing An Arctic Town. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/ericmack/2019/02/09/threatened-polar-bears-are-terrorizing-a-small-arctic-town/#231688406710
2:
McMillan, F. (2019, January 30). Climate
Change Is Melting Arctic Sea Ice - And That's Endangering Ringed Seal Populations. Forbes. Retrieved from: https://www.forbes.com/sites/fionamcmillan/2019/01/30/the-decline-of-arctic-snow-could-decimate-ringed-seals/#46893f5f650b
3:
Pierre-Louis,
K. (2017, December 20). Beavers
Emerge as Agents of Arctic Destruction. The New York Times.
Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/20/climate/arctic-beavers-alaska.html
4:
Myers, S.L., Revkin, A.C., Romero, S., Krauss, C. (2005, October 20). Old Ways of Life Are Fading as the Arctic
Thaws. The New York Times. Retrieved from: https://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/20/science/earth/old-ways-of-life-are-fading-as-the-arctic-thaws.html
5:
Rosen, J. (2017, February 8). Arctic 2.0: What happens after all the ice
goes? Nature.
Retrieved from: https://www.nature.com/news/arctic-2-0-what-happens-after-all-the-ice-goes-1.21431
6.
Leahy, S. (2018, February 1). POV FOOTAGE
SHOWS POLAR BEARS STRUGGLING TO FIND FOOD. National Geographic. Retrieved
from: https://news.nationalgeographic.com/2018/02/polar-bears-starve-melting-sea-ice-global-warming-study-beaufort-sea-environment/
This article raises an ethical question to mind that you began to touch on in the concluding sentences- how much involvement should humans have in changing an ecosystem? I am of course all for the protection of the environment, limiting climate change, and protecting species, but should we limit/destroy the growth of one species to promote another?
ReplyDeleteIf we thought about this in human terms, should we rob the rich to give to the poor? and will our funds to the poor be sufficient to actually help them?
In otherwords, how do you think the limiting of beavers will specifically help the seals and polar bears? And is the amount of work needed to limit the beavers humanely worth it?
I agree that there are many different issues to consider when trying to find a solution to this problem. It is hard to determine if we should help one species over another. You bring up valid points with the rich and poor example and I originally did not see it that way. Maybe instead of reducing the growth of a species we control the range it has access to. I think the main issue that needs to be handled is the carbon emission that is decreasing the ice. If this is handled then issues such as the problems with the beaver would be less of a concern.
DeleteI agree that the focus should be on reducing global warming and the loss of ice in the first place, but do you think it is possible for this to occur given the amount of time these species have left?
DeleteInteresting on how melting glaciers can have such a diverse, large scale impact on animals that live within the region by limiting habitat for some organisms while providing it for others. Although, I am skeptical the efficiency of the wind-powered water pumps and what additional issues may arise from them. How will more human interaction interfere with the wildlife, will it produce noise pollution, cost/repercussions of installing the pumps, and will this ice buildup become sturdy enough to support arctic life?
ReplyDeleteI agree that the pumps could cause more issues especially when it comes to additional human interaction. I think the main focus we should have is reducing mining, oil and gas exploration, ports or other industrial incursions. I am curious to look into other ways people are trying to rebuild the ice and how it is affecting species.
Delete