Sunday, February 16, 2014

Are Pesticides the Primary Contributor to the Decline of Honeybees?


The danger of losing one of the world’s most efficient pollinators is imminent- honeybees, (Apis mellifera), are on the decline in many parts of the world.
During the winter of 2006-2007, unusually high losses of 30-90% of bee hives were reported by bee farmers.  Farmers noted that the worker bee population had vanished, leaving the queen and young behind.  Oddly, the missing bees are never found dead around the hive- they disappear.  Without the worker bees in a colony, the hive eventually dies.  This sequence of events is known as colony collapse disorder (CCD).
CCD is now described as “a serious problem threatening the health of bees and the economic stability of commercial beekeeping and pollination operations”.  Bees are integral to sustaining the world’s food supply as one-third of the food we eat is directly or indirectly affected by pollination.  It is estimated that bee pollination is responsible for more than $15 billion in increased crop value each year. 
With bees on the decline, several studies over the past eight years have been trying to determine the cause of CCD.  The New York Times reports on a USDA publication which describes CCD as having several factors to the decline of honeybees.  A complex set of stressors and pathogens are thought to contribute to CCD, which are described in the following figure.  Pesticides, especially the insecticide class of neonicotinoids, are thought to be a primary driver for CCD.

 
 
Neonicotinoids are systemic insecticides, as they are taken up by the plant’s vascular system and distributed throughout the plant.  Generally, neonicotinoids are applied to the seeds of crops, but crops can also receive spray applications.  Pests ingest the toxin as they consume parts of the plant, and die as the central nervous system is affected, causing paralysis and death.  Although bees are not the target pest, the pollen and nectar of the plants contain the insecticide, which is then transported to the rest of the hive, which may induce CCD.  Other effects may include disruptions in bee mobility, navigation, feeding behavior, foraging activity, memory and learning, and overall hive activity. 
 
Discussions of placing a ban on neonicotinoids are not uncommon.  A recent report stated that the European Union (EU) has discussed placing a ban on these insecticides in hopes of boosting bee populations.  Although a majority of the EU (15 countries) voted for banning the insecticides, 8 countries voted against the ban and 4 countries abstained, because of the lacking scientific data.
John Atkins, Chief Operating Officer of Syngenta, the world’s foremost producer of neonicotinoids agrees that more scientific data is needed before a ban on neonicotinoids is instated. He states, “…a ban on neonicotinoids would simply close the door to understanding the problem’ [of bee populations declining]’’.  Syngenta also states on its page concerning decreasing bee populations, “Neonicotinoids are some of the most effective forms of crop protection technology available and have been used safely across millions of hectares of European crops. Many years of independent monitoring prove that when used properly – as they consistently are – neonicotinoids do not damage the health of bee populations”.  A YouTube video by Syngenta outlining the benefits of neonicotinoid use and potential problems with a ban is located here.
 
On the contrary, several studies indicate that the effect of neonicotinoids on bees is devastating in more ways than one.  In addition to possible CCD effects, a French study noted that exposure makes it harder for bees to return to their hive as the neonicotinoids cause confusion.  A British study found that bees do not collect enough food to sustain their hive, therefore compromising the health of the colony.  Another study linked neonicotinoid exposure to depressed immune system function.  With a depressed immune system, honeybees are more susceptible to viral and bacterial attack.
Not only do neonicotinoid exposure affect bee health, but a myriad of other pesticides do as well, according to this EcoNews article.  The study’s findings supplement the USDA’s report on several factors affecting bee populations.  In addition to the USDA’s findings, the researchers found 35 different pesticides in pollen with samples averaging 9 different pesticides ranging from neonicotinoids, pyrethroids, carbamates, organophosphates, and more.  The study suggests that neonicotinoids are not just to blame- there are other chemicals present that may cause just as much harm to bee populations. 
 
Over the years, studies have confirmed that there are several factors that contribute to CCD.  Pesticides like neonicotinoids are currently to blame for the rapid decrease in bee populations among the other causes of CCD.  Is the banning of neonicotinoids or other pesticides the best option to save the honeybee?  Or will CCD eliminate our crucial pollinators by increasing the incidence of biological elements beyond human control?
 

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Fukushima and the Danger it Doesn’t Present to the U.S.


Even if you’ve lived under a rock for the last few years, it’s unlikely that you haven’t heard of the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Plant Disaster, when an earthquake and tsunami duo caused the three main reactors in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant to meltdown within three days. It’s also no secret that Japan is still trying to control and clean up the mess three years later—but with debris, temporary unstable water storage, and patchwork leaks, they’re having a difficult go of it. And if you’ve been on the internet, you’ve seen at least one social media post predicting the end of our days because of the radiation leaks into the Pacific Ocean.
So, if there’s radiation headed our way by ocean current, doesn’t this mean we’re doomed?!
The answer is a pleasant, “No, we’re not doomed…we’re not really even affected.” It’s true that since the meltdown, amounts of radiation contaminated water have been leaking into the ocean, but, despite what fear-mongers would have you believe, in such a vast solute as the Pacific radiation is diluted to an insignificant amount by the time it reaches our coasts. Admittedly the levels are traceable, but scientists such as Nicholas Fisher and other local West Coast governments assure that the concentrations are so low we’re exposed to higher concentrations from naturally occurring sources, like bananas.
Other biologists, including Steven Manley, are quelling the people’s fears by starting Kelp Watch 2014. In the next year, biologists up and down the West Coast will be sampling coastline kelp for radiation deposits, since they’re sponge like and soak up particles in their environment. Manley admits, that it’s “mostly because the public is freaked out by all this talk of radioactivity” and if they could “see the numbers and a commentary as to what they mean, hopefully that’ll put them at ease.” Do he and his colleagues expect to find anything significant? No, but they’re hoping the bare facts will control the doomsday beliefs.
Marine scientists, including Fisher, have already calculated the exposure rate on the coast, saying it’s roughly a tenth of our average daily dose here in the U.S. Where the worry lies, in the end, is in Japan where all the radiation is at its highest levels and undiluted by the sea.

Friday, April 27, 2012

Bioaccumulation of POP's in Humpback Whales


The Humpback whale is an endangered species.  There are around 10,000 to 15,000 of them world wide. This whale can be found in all of the words oceans and they make seasonal migrations for feeding and breeding.  During the winter months, the whales travel to the warm tropical waters to breed.  It takes a female 11-12 months to develop the calf before it is born.  After the calf is born it consumes around one hundred pounds of milk a day from its mother and stays with her for about a year.  It will take a whale 15 years to fully mature.  During the summer months, the whales travel to the cold arctic waters to feed.  In these cold waters they consume about 1 ton of food daily.  The feeding season lasts for 120 days and then the whales live off of stored fat for the remaining seasons.  These mammals can live up to be 45-50 years old.  Since the Humpback whale is such a long lived animal, it makes them the perfect bioindicator.  Humpback whales have been used in studies to determine the concentrations of persistent organic pollutants found in their body and also in the different feeding areas of the whales.  While consuming small fish, crustaceans, and plankton, the whales are also consuming small concentrations of persistent organic pollutants (POP’s).  POP’s are compounds that do not degenerate in the natural environment and build up in systems.  This build up of the POP’s introduces the concept of bioaccumulation, which is the intake of an organic compound at a higher rate than the rate that it is leaving the system.  The POP’s are entering the marine systems through run off, waste, and atmospheric pollution.  With the help of currents and the Westerlies these pollutants are carried and spread at a global scale.  
 In a study the blubber of humpback whales was sampled from male whales at various feeding locations in the Pacific and Atlantic Ocean.  A chromatography test was then run test for the following POP’s: PCB’s, DDT, Chlordanes, PBDE’s, and HCH’s.  The goal of this study was to see if these pollutants were present in higher concentrations in certain feeding locations and if the concentrations of these pollutants were of any harm to the whales.  The studied showed that the North Atlantic contained the most contaminants and the Gulf of Maine specifically had significantly higher concentrations than the other areas tested (Elfes, et. al, 2009).  These high concentrations were thought to be caused by the increased industrialization and the increased population size (Elfes, et. al, 2009).  The difference in results could also be caused by change in prey found in the different feeding locations; for example the whales feeding in the North Atlantic could be consuming prey of a higher trophic level than those whales feeding in the Pacific (Elfes, et. al, 2009).  Also from these results another observation was made.  A positive correlation between the age and concentration was found.  With the increase of whale age there was an increase of the concentrations of the POP’s (Elfes, et. al, 2009).  This was perfect correlation to represent the bioaccumulation of the POP’s in the humpback whale.    
Another study also wanted to test the concentrations of POP's in the humpback whale.  Instead of focusing on the feeding locations and age, the test compared the concentrations of the POP’s found in female whales to those found in the calves.  The goal of this was to see if the female whale transferred some of her concentrations to the calf during the offspring development (Metcalfe, et. al, 2003).  The concentrations of the two were found to be very similar in each of the POP’s tested for, with no significant difference (Metcalfe, et. al, 2003).  Since there was no significant difference in the concentrations of the pollutants found in the female and calf, it was predicted that the female whale does in fact transfer it’s contaminants to the calf (Metcalfe, et. al, 2003).  It was stated that this could be possible through transplacental and lactational transfers (Metcalfe, et. al, 2003).               

Although there were pollutants found in all of the blubber samples, the concentrations present were not at threatening levels to the whales.  But it is a prefect example that POP’s do not degenerate and remain in the environment for decades.  Even though several of the POP’s have been banned from use it does not mean that they do not exist in the environment.  In fact as the economy grows, new pollutants are being introduced into the environment.  Since the humpback whale is an endangered species, it is important to continue to monitor these concentrations in order to ensure that no unnatural harm is being exposed to the whales. 

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Approaching Climate Change through Text!

Image from wttw.com
Have you ever thought about places across the world who do not use technology as much as we do or have you ever thought about living your daily life without a cell phone?  I know I have not, but there are places like Zimbabwe who do not have access to cell phones and technology the way that people in developed countries like the United States do.  It is hard for people who live in places like Zimbabwe to communicate effectively due to this technology dilemma. 


Image from southafricain1.com
The issue of climate change is one that has been more heavily debated in terms of "is it real?" or "is it not real?" over the past couple of decades.  Many experts on this issue see climate change as a major issue that is affecting the people and the environment all across the world.  A current article from allafrica.com presents information about how program developers, civic society, environmentalists and other interested stakeholders met in Harare to discuss ways of how the mobile phone could be used to communicate information about climate change effectively in places like Zimbabwe.  A competition funded by the US government called Apps4Africa was held to encourage local people to create country-specific applications for climate change and global warming.  Many Americans entered the challenge with knowledge of what climate change can to do to places who are not aware of its’ effects and hope to provide places like Zimbabwe with the appropriate technology to allow them to understand the affects of climate change.  With the increase in technology spreading worldwide, the use of these types of climate change applications will provide information about protecting oneself from effects of climate change and how to reduce behaviors that are not friendly to the environment in Zimbabwe.   With the use of the mobile phone, people who live in places like Zimbabwe no longer have to travel long distances by foot or bus to deliver these same messages of sustainability against climate change.  The mobile phone is now being used to deliver bulk messages to the public on topics such as education texts on sex, HIV and Aids.  In my opinion, this is a step in a positive direction on informing undeveloped countries on the effects of issues like climate change that can change the world around everyone in a negative way.


The issue of whether or not people believe in climate change is up too them, but it is important to realize that this is an issue that does hold some truth so I feel that it is better to be safe than sorry!!
Image from wikispaces.com

Sunday, May 1, 2011

P.E.A.K.


The PEAK (P romoting E nvironmental A wareness in K ids) program is the result of a unique partnership between REI (Recreation Equipment, Inc.) and the Leave No Trace Center for Outdoor Ethics. PEAK is based on the seven principles of Leave No Trace and is designed to educate children about the outdoors and responsible use of our shared public lands.
The program is available for kids of all ages and involves a plethera of activities for children. A short list of activites includes...
Discovering the Leave No Trace Principles - An introduction to the principles through demonstration of preparing for an outdoor trip; works great as a skit.

How Long Does it Last? - Find how long it really takes for common trash/recyclable to break down in nature and why it's important to Trash our Trash.

Watch Your Step - There are living organisms everything. Explore your world from an ant's level and find out why it's important to stick to trails.

Leave No Trace Draw - Many Leave No Trace decisions can be made along the trail. A version of a relay race, participants will decide whether they advance on the trail by answering Leave No Trace related quetions.

Step on It! - Why is it important to stick to trails? How do we know how to do this? Compete with your team to answer questions and learn how to Choose the Right Path when outdoors.

What Principle Am I? - Test your knowledge of the Leave No Trace principles by listening to clues and deciding What Principle Am I?

Leave No Trace Crime Scene - Have your youth become CSI investigators as they stumble upon a campsite leave no trace "crime scene."

Minimum Impact Match - Find out what different gear items will help you Leave No Trace when you are outdoors. Ask Yes/No questions to find out what gear you represent, then find your match!

Treks and Track's Great Adventure - Meet all the PEAK characters and the principles they represent as Trek and Track (a pair of boots) head out on an outdoor adventure.

Leave No Trace Relay - Set up a Leave No Trace obstacle course for your students, with stops and activities representing each Leave No Trace principle.


The program is based on 7 principles of Leave No Trace. Know Before You Go, Choose The Right Path, Trash Your Trash, Leave What You Find, Be Careful With Fire, Respect Wildlife, Be Kind To Other Visitors


http://www.lnt.org/programs/peak.php

The Solar Decathlon


The solar decathlon is a fun competition that is a great example for new ideas in sustainable solutions. The U.S. Department of Energy Solar Decathlon challenges 20 collegiate teams to design, build, and operate solar-powered houses that are cost-effective, energy-efficient, and attractive. The winner of the competition is the team that best blends affordability, consumer appeal, and design excellence with optimal energy production and maximum efficiency. The event takes place every two years in Washington D.C..
When looking into this I found an amazing house, that has a great design and creative ideas. The House is called "The Watershed" and was designed by students at the University of Maryland. The house has two different sides and two seperate roofs. One roof is layered with solar panels to power the house with electricity. The other roof is topped with a butterfly garden, this is installed to collect rain water for everyday use. The house is projected to be able to sustain itself with electricity and water year round.
You may ask yourself, but there isn't enough rainwater to sustain it, and if so it may be acid rain. This is (to me) the coolest part of the house. The house is based on the ecosystem of Chesapeake Bay. Natural ecosystems have evolved over millions of years to sustainably harness energy, produce food, and recycle waste. Not to mention the house has a stream running through it!!!!
The house has a plethora of other features as well. Constructed wetlands, filtering stormwater and greywater for reuse.A green roof, retaining stormwater and minimizing the heat island effect. An optimally-sized photovoltaic array, harvesting enough energy from the sun to power WaterShed year round. Edible landscapes, supporting community-based agriculture. A liquid desiccant waterfall, providing high-efficiency humidity control in the form of an indoor water feature. A solar thermal array, supplying enough energy to provide all domestic hot-water, desiccant regeneration and supplemental space heating. Engineering systems, working in harmony, each acting to increase the effectiveness of the others. A time-tested structural system that is efficient, cost-effective and durable.

Here is a video of a digital walkthrough of the house. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZJe2CReFA8&feature=player_embedded

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Reuse-A-Shoe


During Earth Week a few weeks ago, there was a shoe drive on campus. Fifty shoes were collected during the week.
The program comes from Nike Shoe, and since 1990 they have globally collected over 25,056,779 pairs of shoes. They have collected so many shoes that you could "create a chain of athletic shoes that goes all the way around the world more than five times"! By collecting all of these old shoes and putting them to use in other ways, there is a decrease in the amount of virgin rubber and other materials. The recycled shoes can be used to build new courts (such as tennis and basketball), tracks, fields, and playgrounds. Nike's next goal is to be able to recycle sports shoes, apparel, and equipment back into new Nike products.
Their US facility that recycles the shoes is located in Memphis, Tennessee. They use a "slice-and-grind" process which separates the shoe into three parts: rubber outsole, foam midsole, and fiber uppers. The three pieces are fed through grinders and then purified. The shoes rubber outsole is used in playground surfaces, track surfaces, interlocking gym flooring tiles, and even some new Nike products. In addition, the rubber is also used in trim for things like buttons and zipper pulls. The foam comes from the midsole of the shoe and is used as a cushion for outdoor basketball and tennis courts. The upper part of the shoe, the fiber, is used for cushioning pads for things like wood courts and indoor synthetic courts. These are all just examples of uses. There are many other uses that I have not covered.
So you may be asking yourself, how do I recycled these shoes so I can help make an impact? Well there are over 300 locations in the US that have bins available for drop offs. Here in Ohio, you can take your old shoes to Aurora, Jeffersonville, or Monroe. Or you can even organize a group shoe drive for your school, youth organization, or nonprofit organization. Any brand of athletic shoes can be recycled along with LIVESTRONG bracelets. They cannot accept cleats, dress shoes, shoes with metal, sandals, other type of wristbands, and flip-flops (however, check Old Navy out for their recycled flip-flop program).
For more information and a quick video, check out http://www.nikereuseashoe.com/